Reading about the ICD-10 conversion you can find many articles out there today. These range from “I told you so” type articles to looking at some of the ins & outs and early lessons learned in the first business quarter, since the mandated implementation took place on 1 October 2015. That said, there are some mixed messages regarding implementation success.
For example, the Coalition for ICD-10 reports that “Some healthcare providers are reporting a few ICD-10 denials but not enough to worry about. On the other hand, CoaltionforICD10.org reported that a healthcare consultant found out that a California HMO was denying medical claims on a massive scale. Additionally, National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) and Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) have needed tweaks to prevent mistaken denials.
So if you don’t consider coverage denials a major national problem, it certainly can be categorized as a major problem for individual medical practices. So there are fixes still required for the new system.
ICD10Watch published a very helpful article that talks about 3 keys to success in this new ICD-10 environment. Those keys included:
Best advice: How to Prevent Denials
Chris Nerney at Revenue Cycle Insights had a great article that identifies three things that can help healthcare providers prevent claims denials:
In a way, the macro level claim denial statistics don't matter as much as the individual anecdotes. Those stories are valuable examples of how to solve denial issues.
One of the best insights of the article was the advice that, “Waiting to find out how the ICD-10 transition went is a bit like using the rear view mirror to drive a car.” So they recommend that you keep your eyes on the road ahead. That means making sure the most specific ICD-10 codes are properly used, and clinical documentation supports those diagnoses. And specificity will be key in the year ahead, according to Stanley Nachimson, Principal of Nachimson Advisors.
Nachimson explains:
Also, ICD-10 proponents promised that the more specific diagnoses and codes would be used to benefit population health. Nachimson recommends that a medical practice "should invest in a robust electronic medical record (EMR) and/or practice management system (PMS) that can offer assistance in mining data." ICD-10 implementation was just one of many changes in store for U.S. healthcare. Medical practices need to develop robust ICD-10 coding practices to keep up with the changes.
Key Lessons from ICD-10 transitions at large hospitals
HEALTHCARE IT NEWSOCT states that for the most part, the largest U.S. healthcare providers have been very organized and prepared for ICD-10 implementation. The key lessons learned so far include:
Implications for the “Little Guys”…. And a Solution
So what does all this mean for the many small medical practices that are out there? Do they have the same issues to deal with? Absolutely! Codes are codes – no matter what scale you talk about. Whether you have 20 diagnosis or 2000 / day, it all seems to come down to one central theme - TRAINING
Effective October 2015, the coding system officially transitioned from ICD-9 to ICD-10-CM/PCS. The structure of the new code sets is radically different from ICD-9. ICD-10 implementation will impact virtually all processes, technology and people within a health care enterprise. Be ready for the transition to the ICD-10-CM with this ICD 10 Transition course. This course will provide an introduction to ICD-10-CM coding and help you translate your knowledge of ICD-9-CM coding to the new code set. Through the use of expert developed learning modules, in-course activities, and case studies, you will learn everything you need to know to make the transition to ICD 10.
Students taking this course will be able to:
Learn more about ProTrain's ICD-10 Coding course.